fbpx Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1‑year follow‑up |ARAB AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
Contact information for Technical Support and Student Assistance ... Click here

Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1‑year follow‑up

Authors: 
Rola Shadid
ISSN: 
1746-160X
Journal Name: 
Head & face medicine
Volume: 
18
Issue: 
17
Pages From: 
1
To: 
13
Date: 
Friday, June 10, 2022
Keywords: 
Dental implantation, Success rate, Osseointegration, Socket shield, Case series
Abstract: 
Background: The aims of this case series were to investigate the clinical, radiographic, implant success, complication incidence, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of 10 immediately placed implants associated with the socket shield technique at 12 months post-loading and to assess the ridge width changes that occurred at 8 months following implant placement. Methods: A total of 10 patients received 10 socket shield immediate implants (MegaGen AnyRidge). At 8 months postimplantation, casts were made to assess the ridge width changes by measuring the ridge width at the implant sites and comparing them with the corresponding measurements at the contralateral tooth site. At 12 months postloading, clinical indices, marginal bone loss, pink esthetic score, and patient-assessed outcomes were evaluated. The mean, standard deviation and median were calculated for all continuous variables. Results: All implants demonstrated a 100% success rate, while 2 implants presented with external shield exposure that was managed successfully. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.08 ± 0.14 mm mesially and 0.21 ± 0.23 mm distally. Esthetic evaluation yielded an average modified pink esthetic score of 8.65. A mean gain of 0.17 mm in the facial-palatal ridge width was recorded at 8 months postimplantation. Conclusions: The socket shield technique enhanced the functional and esthetic results by preserving the alveolar bone and peri-implant soft tissues. However, this is a sensitive technique and still needs more robust evidence before it can be recommended for everyday clinical practice.